Education Policy Analysis Archives (EPAA)
Files
Download Full Text (236 KB)
Publisher
Arizona State University, University of South Florida
Publication Date
December 2003
Abstract
Since about 90% of schools, colleges, and departments of education are currently using portfolios of one form or another as decision-making tools for standards-based decisions regarding certification or licensure (as well as NCATE accreditation), it is appropriate to explore the legal and psychometric aspects of this assessment device. The authors demonstrate that portfolios being used in a high-stakes context are technically testing devices and therefore need to meet psychometric standards of validity, reliability, fairness, and absence of bias. ...
Extent
30
Volume
11
Issue
45
Language
English
Media Type
Journals (Periodicals)
Format
Digital Only
Note
Citation: Wilkerson, J.R., & Lang, W.S. (2003, December 3). Portfolios, the Pied Piper of teacher certification assessments: Legal and psychometric issues. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 11(45). Retrieved [Date] from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v11n45/.
Identifier
E11-00343
Creative Commons
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License.
Recommended Citation
Wilkerson, Judy R. and Lang, William Steve, "Portfolios, the Pied Piper of Teacher Certification Assessments: Legal and Psychometric Issues" (2003). Education Policy Analysis Archives (EPAA). 124.
https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/usf_EPAA/124