Re-analysis of NAEP Math and Reading Scores in States with and without High-stakes Tests: Response to Rosenshine

Creator

Audrey Amrein-Beardsley
David C. Berliner

Files

Publisher

Arizona State University, University of South Florida

Publication Date

August 2003

Abstract

Here we address the criticism of our NAEP analyses by Rosenshine (2003). On the basis of his thoughtful critique we redid some of the analyses on which he focused. Our findings contradict his. This is no fault of his, the reasons for which are explained in this paper. Our findings do support our position that high-stakes tests do not do much to improve academic achievement. ...

Extent

16

Volume

11

Issue

25

Language

English

Media Type

Journals (Periodicals)

Format

Digital Only

Note

Citation: Amrein-Beardsley, A. A. & Berliner, D. C. (2003, August 4). Re-analysis of NAEP math and reading scores in states with and without high-stakes tests: Response to Rosenshine. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 11(25). Retrieved [Date] from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v11n25/.

Identifier

E11-00323

Creative Commons

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License.

Recommended Citation

Amrein-Beardsley, Audrey and Berliner, David C., "Re-analysis of NAEP Math and Reading Scores in States with and without High-stakes Tests: Response to Rosenshine" (2003). Education Policy Analysis Archives (EPAA). 463.
https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/usf_EPAA/463