The Technologies of Normalization and Self: Thinking About IRBs and Extrinsic Research Ethics With Foucault
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2007
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800407308822
Abstract
In this article, the authors discuss the technologies of normalization and self in relation to ethics and the problematization of extrinsic research ethics. They argue that institutional review boards (IRBs) and other similar institutional mechanisms promote extrinsic forms of ethics that are exemplified through institutionalized structures such as (a) the Belmont Report, (b) IRB protocol, (c) informed consent, and (d) localized interpretations of IRB rules and regulations. However, at the same time, institutional normalization enables researchers and participants to construct themselves as ethically responsible participants through resistance and critical reflection. Such “care of the self” and critical awareness of dominant discourses and regimes of power and knowledge are essential to the development and practice of research that is ethical, free, and responsive. Finally, the authors conclude that the discussions about researchers' ethical decision making and freedom of choice need to be separate from discussions related to researchers' compliance, duties, and institutional responsibilities.
Citation / Publisher Attribution
Qualitative Inquiry, v. 13, issue 8, p. 1075-1094
Scholar Commons Citation
Koro-Ljungberg, Mirka; Gemignani, Marco; Brodeur, Cheri Winton; and Kmiec, Cheryl, "The Technologies of Normalization and Self: Thinking About IRBs and Extrinsic Research Ethics With Foucault" (2007). Teaching and Learning Faculty Publications. 175.
https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/tal_facpub/175
