Abstract
As transitional justice has grown as a field and as an international mandate in post-atrocity contexts over the past several decades, the memorialization of past atrocities through the construction of physical spaces of memory has increasingly been recognized as an essential aspect of this complex process. Often, these spaces of memory are touted not only as honoring past victims, but also as important tools for preventing future violence. To date, there has yet to emerge a clear way to measure exactly how sites of memory contribute to atrocity prevention. Can a site of memory really help prevent further acts of atrocity violence? If so, when and how are sites of memory a preventive force? This article describes the findings of three years of research into more than 400 memory sites around the world, with a focus on the programming and activities undertaken by various sites not only to engage with the past, but to respond to contemporary risks of large-scale, identity-based violence. This article posits that memory sites can be identified as preventive when they succeed at mitigating or eliminating any of the identifiable risk factors that lead to atrocity.
First Page
37
Last Page
53
Acknowledgements
This research was funded through a grant by the US State Department’s Bureau for Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor to the Auschwitz Institute for the Prevention of Genocide and Mass Atrocities.
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5038/1911-9933.18.1.1954
Recommended Citation
Whigham, Kerry E.
(2024)
"More than Memory: Can Memory Spaces Really Prevent Mass Atrocities?,"
Genocide Studies and Prevention: An International Journal:
Vol. 18:
Iss.
1:
37–53.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5038/1911-9933.18.1.1954
Available at: https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/gsp/vol18/iss1/7
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 License
