Education Policy Analysis Archives (EPAA)
Files
Download Full Text (515 KB)
Publisher
Arizona State University, University of South Florida
Publication Date
February 1999
Abstract
The Massachusetts Teacher Tests (MTT), introduced last year, have never been subject to external review as required by the measurement profession's standards and many legal precedents. Neither the Massachusetts Department of Education (DOE) nor the tests' manufacturer have made public information about the exams' reliability (consistency) or validity (meaningfulness). Using data from state and academic reports from the April and July test dates, an ad hoc committee of nationally-known researchers has now been able to make a preliminary assessment of the exams. The committee focused on the Communications and Literacy exam that was required of all prospective teachers regardless of grade level or subject area. The purpose of the analysis was to determine the accuracy of the tests in assessing the reading and writing skills of the test-takers. ...
Extent
67
Geographic Location
Massachusetts
Volume
7
Issue
4
Language
English
Media Type
Journals (Periodicals)
Format
Digital Only
Identifier
E11-00116
Creative Commons
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License.
Recommended Citation
Haney, Walt; Fowler, Clarke; Wheelock, Anne; Bebell, Damian; and Malec, Nicole, "Less Truth than Error? An Independent Study of the Massachusetts Teacher Tests" (1999). Education Policy Analysis Archives (EPAA). 340.
https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/usf_EPAA/340