Implementation of NCCN Distress Management Guidelines by Member Institutions

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

2007

Keywords

Psychological distress, clinical practice guidelines, screening

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2007.0010

Abstract

Up to half of all adults with cancer experience clinically significant psychological distress and much of this distress goes unrecognized and untreated. As part of an effort to improve the care of cancer patients, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) has developed clinical practice guidelines for distress management that include recommendations about the evaluation and treatment of distress. These authors conducted a study to evaluate the implementation of these distress management guidelines by NCCN member institutions. The NCCN member institutions that treat adults were asked in April and May 2005 to describe their distress management practices, and 15 (83%) provided responses. Of these, 8 (53%) conduct routine distress screening for at least some patient groups, with 4 additional institutions (27%) pilot-testing screening strategies. However, only 20% of surveyed member institutions screened all patients as the guidelines recommend. In addition, whether institutions that conduct routine distress screening do so through standardized assessment methods is unclear, because 37.5% of institutions that conduct screening rely only on interviews to identify distressed patients. Findings suggest that most institutions consider screening patients' mental health concerns important and worthwhile, but that greater implementation of guideline recommendations is needed.

Was this content written or created while at USF?

Yes

Citation / Publisher Attribution

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, v. 5, issue 1, p. 99-103

Link to Full Text

Share

COinS