Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2011
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2011.00002
Abstract
The decades-old debate about the optimum organizational structure of the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA) and National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) has reached a crescendo with the recent deliberations of the Scientific Management Review Board, which, despite the lack of a crisis, proposed a structural reorganization that would dissolve the two institutes and create a new institute for substance use, abuse, and addiction, in hope of new scientific and public health advances (Collins, 2010). For a new institute to succeed, a multitude of potential challenges need to be negotiated effectively
Rights Information
Was this content written or created while at USF?
Yes
Citation / Publisher Attribution
Frontiers in Psychiatry, v. 2, art. 2
© 2011 Johnson, Messing, Charness, Crabbe, Goldman, Harris, Kranzler, Mitchell, Nixon, Riley, Schuckit, Sher and Thomas. This is an open-access article subject to a non-exclusive license between the authors and Frontiers Media SA, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and other Frontiers conditions are complied with.
Scholar Commons Citation
Johnson, Bankole A.; Messing, Robert O.; Charness, Michael E.; Crabbe, John C.; Goldman, Mark S.; Harris, R. Adron; Kranzler, Henry R.; Mitchell Jr., Mack C.; Nixon, Sara Jo; Riley, Edward P.; Schuckit, Marc A.; Sher, Kenneth J.; and Thomas, Jennifer D., "How Should Addiction-Related Research at the National Institutes of Health be Reorganized?" (2011). Psychology Faculty Publications. 1653.
https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/psy_facpub/1653
