USF St. Petersburg campus Faculty Publications
Defining and analyzing journalistic deception.
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
1992
Abstract
Many journalists, readers and scholars exhibit confusion concerning the nature and justification of deception. In this article, we clarify those acts that should count as deception. Before discussing if any cases of deception can be construed as morally justified, we clarify which investigative, interrogative, and information-giving techniques are deceptive on their face. We also bracket borderline cases.
Language
en_US
Publisher
Routledge
Recommended Citation
Elliott, D. & Culver, C. (1992). Defining and analyzing journalistic deception. Journal of Mass Media Ethics. 7(2), 69-84.
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License.
Comments
Citation only. Full-text article is available only through licensed access provided by the publisher. Published in Journal of Mass Media Ethics. 7(2), 69-84.