Graduation Year

2021

Document Type

Dissertation

Degree

Ph.D.

Degree Name

Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.)

Degree Granting Department

Psychology

Major Professor

Marc Karver, Ph.D.

Committee Member

Jack Darkes, Ph.D.

Committee Member

Jamie Goldenberg, Ph.D.

Committee Member

Fallon Goodman, Ph.D.

Committee Member

Kim Gryglewicz, Ph.D.

Keywords

performance feedback, falling short of standards, negative life events, positive future thought, socially prescribed perfectionism, demoralization

Abstract

Negative performance feedback is relatively common and may be related to negative mental health outcomes, but there is a lack of sufficient experimental research. Further, little is known about the pathway by which effects emerge, or factors that may enhance or attenuate resilience to the effects of negative performance feedback. There is preliminary support for a cognitive pathway through appraisals of falling short of standards, but this specific model remains untested. Likewise, research suggests that perfectionism and positive future thinking may affect resilience in the context of negative performance feedback. The present study was among the first to experimentally test this integrated model. A total of 347 participants were randomly assigned to positive, negative, or neutral performance feedback and reported on perfectionism, positive future thinking, appraisals of falling short of standards, and demoralization. The model was partially supported; negative performance feedback contributed to greater demoralization through the hypothesized pathway of appraisals of falling short of standards. Socially prescribed perfectionism and positive future thinking did not moderate these relationships, but socially prescribed perfectionism did increase risk for appraisals of falling short of standards across feedback conditions. Exploratory analyses indicated that self-oriented perfectionism may increase vulnerability for appraisals of falling short of standards in the context of negative performance feedback. These results suggest compelling directions for future research and begin to clarify trajectories of vulnerability and resilience in the face of negative performance feedback.

Share

COinS