Graduation Year
2009
Document Type
Dissertation
Degree
Ph.D.
Degree Granting Department
Philosophy
Major Professor
Kwasi Wiredu, Ph.D.
Co-Major Professor
Stephen Turner, Ph.D.
Committee Member
Alex Levine, Ph.D.
Committee Member
Richard Manning, Ph.D.
Keywords
assertion, propositions, natural language semantics, philosophy of language, epistemology
Abstract
I examine the difficulties that several philosophers of language are liable to encounter in their attempts to provide an account of the connection between truth and assertion. I then attempt to provide an account of this connection. The analysis is concerned chiefly with difficulties which consist in elucidating the conceptual connection between truth and assertion in a way that respects certain linguistic intuitions while at the same time rendering the concept of truth amenable to a semantic interpretation. The proposed view suggests one way in which we might go about meeting the theoretical demands implicit in addressing this concern, among others, demonstrating the extent to which a theory of truth should be regarded as belonging to the province of epistemology. Insofar as semantical considerations figure into such a theory, a more systematic investigation of the interface between epistemology and natural language semantics is recommended. The solution to many problems at this interface, I argue, lay in an analysis of judgment.
Scholar Commons Citation
Kelly, Jeremy J., "Truth And Judgment" (2009). USF Tampa Graduate Theses and Dissertations.
https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/etd/2040