Graduation Year

2024

Document Type

Dissertation

Degree

Ph.D.

Degree Name

Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.)

Degree Granting Department

School of Geosciences

Major Professor

Jeffery Ryan, Ph.D.

Committee Member

Thomas Juster, Ph.D.

Committee Member

Mark Rains, Ph.D.

Committee Member

Janet Richards, Ph.D.

Committee Member

Sarah Sheffield, Ph.D.

Keywords

geoscience education, petrographic microscope, thin sections

Abstract

Undergraduate geoscience laboratory courses provide hands-on learning about earth materials. However thin section analysis is not typically included in introductory geology laboratories, likely due to the polarizing light microscope (PLM) costs. Therefore, there is a lack of research about the educational outcomes of novices learning these skills.

In this inquiry, I conducted mixed methods research about novice students' learning of thin section analysis in an introductory geology laboratory and evaluated learning and perception differences between students who used a virtual PLM and those who used a physical PLM. I collected data from Creative Exercise (CE) assessments in student midterm and final exams, thinking aloud protocols (TAP) and semi-structured interview protocols, and I performed graphical analysis of the joint data as well as thematic analysis.

My findings inform curriculum and instruction of novices introduced to thin section analysis. My participants produced acceptable exam scores, despite the challenges of developing mental mineral images, making connections between observations and mineral properties, and adopting vocabulary to communicate and support conclusions. Neither the statistical outcomes nor the qualitative results suggested students would be disadvantaged through virtual PLMs experiences. Critically, the PLM experiences improved engagement, enhanced the perception of geology, and promoted geology as a career option.

Included in

Geography Commons

Share

COinS