Document Type

Article

Publication Date

2016

Keywords

Animals, Biomechanical Phenomena, Lampreys, Models, Biological, Pressure, Rotation, Suction, Swimming, Tail, Time Factors

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.144642

Abstract

Swimming animals commonly bend their bodies to generate thrust. For undulating animals such as eels and lampreys, their bodies bend in the form of waves that travel from head to tail. These kinematics accelerate the flow of adjacent fluids, which alters the pressure field in a manner that generates thrust. We used a comparative approach to evaluate the cause-and-effect relationships in this process by quantifying the hydrodynamic effects of body kinematics at the body-fluid interface of the lamprey, Petromyzon marinus, during steady-state swimming. We compared the kinematics and hydrodynamics of healthy control lampreys to lampreys whose spinal cord had been transected mid-body, resulting in passive kinematics along the posterior half of their body. Using high-speed particle image velocimetry (PIV) and a method for quantifying pressure fields, we detail how the active bending kinematics of the control lampreys were crucial for setting up strong negative pressure fields (relative to ambient fields) that generated high-thrust regions at the bends as they traveled all along the body. The passive kinematics of the transected lamprey were only able to generate significant thrust at the tail, relying on positive pressure fields. These different pressure and thrust scenarios are due to differences in how active versus passive body waves generated and controlled vorticity. This demonstrates why it is more effective for undulating lampreys to pull, rather than push, themselves through the fluid.

Was this content written or created while at USF?

Yes

Citation / Publisher Attribution

Journal of Experimental Biology, v. 2016 issue 219, p. 3884-3895

The final authenticated version is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.144642.

Share

COinS