Graduation Year
2010
Document Type
Thesis
Degree
M.A.
Degree Granting Department
Psychology
Major Professor
Michael Coovert, Ph.D.
Co-Major Professor
Joseph Vandello, Ph.D.
Committee Member
Russell Johnson, Ph.D.
Committee Member
Stephen Stark, Ph.D.
Keywords
cyberslacking, withdrawal, CWB, counterproductive work behavior, computers
Abstract
Cyberloafing is the nonsanctioned recreational use of the computers/internet during work hours. Although research is increasing, the processes related to cyberloafing are not well understood. In the current studies, I developed, tested, and evaluated a series of causal minor-cyberloafing models. In Study 1, I empirically compared four minor-cyberloafing taxonomies and selected two of these models as my working taxonomies for minor cyberloafing. In Study 2, I tested and evaluated eight causal minor-cyberloafing models using structural equation modeling techniques and various model-data fit indices. Results of Study 2 indicated that the models were not plausible, bringing into question the value of the proposed models. Despite the poor primary results, I did find a number of potentially important results in the subsequent exploratory analyses. First, I observed high correlations between minor cyberloafing and four of my exploratory variables. Second, I found that one’s perception of the descriptive cyberloafing norms predicted minor cyberloafing above and beyond one’s perception of the injunctive cyberloafing norms. Finally, I found that the predictors cyberloafing attitudes and perceived descriptive norms accounted for a substantial amount of variance in minor cyberloafing. I discuss the theoretical implications of the exploratory results and future directions for research in the discussion section.
Scholar Commons Citation
Askew, Kevin, "Testing the Plausibility of a Series of Causal Minor Cyberloafing Models" (2009). USF Tampa Graduate Theses and Dissertations.
https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/etd/3534