Graduation Year
2010
Document Type
Thesis
Degree
M.A.
Degree Granting Department
Psychology
Major Professor
Walter Borman, Ph.D.
Committee Member
Stephen Stark, Ph.D.
Committee Member
Marcie Finkelstein, Ph.D.
Keywords
neuroticism, agreeableness, conscientiousness, openness to experience, extraversion, impression management
Abstract
A major concern with using personality tests in the selection process is the prevalence of applicant faking behavior which can influence the rank order of applicants such that fakers are hired at an elevated frequency. This study examined the effects of the detection/consequence warning and a more applicant-friendly warning on faking and perceived procedural justice. I hypothesized that a positive warning (reasoning warning) and a detection/consequence warning would show similar mean personality trait levels compared to honest responses, with all means showing less socially desirable responding than no warning prompt. Results suggested that the detection/consequence warning is more effective at reducing faking behavior in the selection context, and the content of the warning has no impact on perceived procedural justice.
Scholar Commons Citation
Dullaghan, T Ryan, "The Effect of a Reasoning Warning on Faking in Personality Testing for Selection and the Perception of Procedural Justice" (2008). USF Tampa Graduate Theses and Dissertations.
https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/etd/1619
