Graduation Year

2025

Document Type

Thesis

Degree

M.A.

Degree Name

Master of Arts (M.A.)

Degree Granting Department

Psychology

Major Professor

Edelyn Verona, Ph.D.

Committee Member

Keanan Joyner, Ph.D.

Committee Member

Kemesha Gabbidon, Ph.D.

Committee Member

Stephen Stark, Ph.D.

Keywords

Ecological Systems Theory, Measurement Bias, Personality, Systemic Disparities

Abstract

Externalizing forms of psychopathology are said to result from a general liability towards impulsive and disruptive behaviors, including substance use, conduct problems, aggression, and antisocial behavior (Krueger et al., 2021). While the field often focuses on dispositional explanations of externalizing behaviors, there is a notable lack of attention to the contextual factors that contribute to these behaviors, beyond immediate environmental influences. This study uses Ecological Systems Theory (Bronfenbrenner, 2005) as a framework to address such gaps in the context of behavioral indicators of the latent externalizing (EXT) construct, an analysis with implications for understanding racial/ethnic and socioeconomic disparities. The present study examines if certain behavioral indicators of EXT vary in the extent to which they reflect the respective traits (metric invariance) or how much EXT trait levels explain observed values of behavioral indicators (scalar invariance) across system-involved youth exposed to varying levels of environmental and systemic disadvantages (e.g., disorganized neighborhoods, racial identity, procedural injustice). Results indicated that metric invariance generally held across contexts, except for higher antisocial peer affiliation, which significantly strengthened the loadings of all EXT indicators. In contrast, scalar noninvariance was evident across nearly all contextual moderators; greater disadvantage tended to raise the intercept values for EXT indicators beyond the latent trait level. School discipline, substance use, juvenile court case history, and impulsivity intercepts appeared to be the most vulnerable to measurement bias. This research is important for addressing biases inherent in our measures and enhancing the cultural sensitivity and accuracy of assessments of externalizing across varied populations.

Share

COinS