Graduation Year
2026
Document Type
Dissertation
Degree
Ph.D.
Degree Name
Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.)
Degree Granting Department
Computer Science and Engineering
Major Professor
Jay Ligatti, Ph.D.
Committee Member
Lingyao Li, Ph.D.
Committee Member
Sriram Chellappan, Ph.D.
Committee Member
Xinming (Simon) Ou, Ph.D.
Committee Member
Achilleas Kourtellis, Ph.D.
Keywords
Adverse Drug Reactions (ADR), Centralized vs. Distributed Information Systems, Computational Risk Assessment, Geometric Overlap Score (GOS), SQL-Identifier Injection Vulnerabilities (SQL-IDIV)
Abstract
Risk detection in large scale information systems increasingly depends on heterogeneous data generatedby both centralized and distributed ecosystems. While centralized systems provide curated and validated reports, distributed environments produce large-scale and real-time observational evidence. Existing computational approaches analyze these ecosystems in isolation, limiting systematic comparison of risk repre-sentations across heterogeneous sources.
This dissertation presents a unified computational framework for comparative risk detection across centralized and distributed information systems. The framework provides a domain independent methodology for transforming heterogeneous risk reporting data into comparable multidimensional representations. To enable interpretable comparison of heterogeneous risk distributions, this work introduces the Geometric Overlap Score (GOS), a novel geometric similarity metric that quantifies overlap between multidimensional feature distributions. The framework further incorporates origami and radar based geometric representations that support scalable visualization and analysis of complex risk reporting datasets.
The proposed methodology is evaluated through two large scale case studies. In cybersecurity, SQL-Identifier Injection Vulnerabilities are analyzed across 4,762,175 source code files from 944,316 GitHub repositories and compared with 3,757 SQL injection related Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures records. In healthcare, natural language processing techniques are applied to 859,751 semaglutide related social media posts to analyze sentiment, discussion topics, and adverse drug reactions, which are compared with FDA clinical trial data. The results demonstrate that centralized and distributed ecosystems provide complementary risk perspectives and that comparative analysis reveals insights not observable from either ecosystem independently. These findings establish a generalizable methodology for multidimensional risk comparison across heterogeneous information systems.
Scholar Commons Citation
Momeni, Parisa, "Building Trustworthy Information Systems: A Unified Framework For Comparative Risk Detection" (2026). USF Tampa Graduate Theses and Dissertations.
https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/etd/11359
