Master of Arts (M.A.)
Degree Granting Department
Michael T. Brannick, Ph.D.
Walter C. Borman, Ph.D.
Vicky Phares, Ph.D.
coping, measurement, interactionism, adversity, hardiness, grit
The current study developed a 40-item situational judgment test (SJT) to measure resilience in context. Undergraduate samples were used in the study and situational stems of the SJT consisted of both daily stressors and major life crises; each response alternative was designed to reflect one of five resilience-related factors. A crowd-sourcing method was utilized to create scoring keys for the SJT. The Resilience SJT demonstrated good psychometric properties, and showed evidence of construct and criterion-related validity. The SJT scores moderately correlated with scores from two resilience Likert scales, a hardiness scale as well as a negative affect scale. Compared to the two Likert-type resilience scales, the SJT demonstrated less overlap with hardiness, positive affect, and negative affect. Moreover, the SJT showed incremental validity in predicting global adjustment, but not academic achievement or college satisfaction, above and beyond the two other resilience measures. Lastly, the study examined different modes of resilient behavior and captured individuals’ mode choice tendencies for resilient responses to adverse situations. The Resilience SJT appears to be a viable alternative to capture resilience. Implications and limitations were discussed.
Scholar Commons Citation
Teng, Yuejia, "Capturing Resilience in Context: Development and Validation of a Situational Judgment Test of Resilience" (2017). USF Tampa Graduate Theses and Dissertations.